“Let the beauty we love be what we do. There are hundreds of
ways to kneel and kiss the ground.”
Rumi
|
The Night-blowing Cereus, Selenicereus grandiflorus |
Sir Alfred Chester Beatty (1875-1968) was a wealthy Irish-American
who was passionate about collecting rare and beautiful objects. His dream was
"To show in one place, every material on which man has communicated with man,
in all parts of the world and through all periods of time."
True to his word,
he amassed the most incredible collection of rare books, manuscripts, prints,
paintings and Oriental art in his lifetime, which he bequeathed to the Irish
State. To house the collection, a
small museum was built on the grounds of
Dublin Castle.
The collection is so enormous that only a fraction of the
artwork can be displayed at any given time, with the remainder being stored in
the museum’s archives. Amongst those hidden treasures, are some rare and
extremely
beautiful botanical art books.
So this week, having been granted the special permission
needed, I found myself being taken into an elegant room with an ornately carved
ceiling and walls lined with mahogany bookcases. Carefully laid out on the
table were the botanical treasures that I sought,
The Temple of Flora, by Robert Thornton, and
The Botanist’s Repository, by Henry Charles Andrews. A
magnifying glass, book snakes and a small reading lamp were conveniently placed
nearby. “Take your time” said the Librarian with a smile. Heaven!
|
Protea longlifolia in The Botanist's repository, by Henry Charles |
Although both books are incredibly beautiful and date from
the same period, it was
The Temple of Flora that really caught my attention,
because there is only one word to describe it…
magnificent. I had seen a copy
before at the
Botanic Gardens in Dublin, but that was just a cursory peek. I
was eager to spend more time poring over the illustrations and to learn more
about the fascinating story behind the book.
|
The Snowdrop and The Crocus (Abraham Pether) |
In 1797, a wealthy
doctor and botany enthusiast named
Robert John Thornton (1768-1837) decided to
commission the most extravagant and sumptuous botanical publication ever
produced. Inspired by the writings of Linnaeus, his florilegium was to explore
the “philosophical principles of botany’, and would thrust Britain into the
forefront of scientific and artistic achievements. The publication was titled
The New Illustration of the Sexual System of Linnaeus and was dedicated to
Queen Charlotte. It was made up of three parts, the third one being The Temple
of Flora.
To create his masterpiece, he engaged the finest artists and
engravers of the time-
Philip Reinagle, (known for his portraits and animal
paintings), Peter Charles Henderson (a miniaturist), Abraham Pethers (famous
for his moonlit landscapes) and
Sydenham Edwards. Thornton himself painted the
Roses with nightingales.
|
A Group of Tulips (Philip Reinagle)
"As each individual Tulip shews a marked Variety, so when grouped together, you have a striking display of the remarkable power of the beneficient CREATOR, who has placed these beautiful objects before us, for our recreation , and admiration! How much does the imitative power of painting fall short of trying to represent these ravishing beauties of the vegetable world." |
Thornton instructed
the artists to paint the plants not in the traditional manner against a plain
background, but to place them in their natural settings, or rather what they
imagined the landscape to be! The prints were made in the basic colours, and
the final image reworked with watercolour washes. No two copies were the same
and in fact, I noticed huge differences between the book in the Library and the
images available online. A team of the top engravers was also employed using
the latest techniques in mezzotint and aquatint.
|
Strelitzia reginae or The Queen Plant (Reinagle) |
Accompanying the 28 beautiful colour plates were various
descriptions, histories and poetic odes about the flowers featured. It was all
very flamboyant, bordering on the ridiculous at times, but delightfully
evocative of the pomp and grandeur of the time. I couldn’t help but giggle at
some of the descriptions. For example, when he discusses the Winged
Passion-Flower, or Passiflora alata, he says that Nature has “often puzzled
shallow philosophers”, and goes on to explain that the “three small serrated
spear-shaped leaves” found at the base of the flower “afford abundant proof
that use is not always the plan of Nature, but that she indulges sometimes in
ornament. Thus we have nipples which answer no other end but as a
correspondence with our better halves.”
I’m not sure if humour was his
intention but I bet that comment raised a few eyebrows!
|
The Winged Passion-Flower, or Passiflora alata (Henderson) |
The Dragon Arum, Dracunculus vulgaris, one of my favourite
illustrations, is given an equally imaginative introduction
“This extremely
foetid poisonous plant will not admit of sober description. Let us therefore
personify it. She comes peeping from her purple crest with mischief fraught;
from her green covert projects a horrid spear of darkest jet, which she
brandishes aloft: issuing from her nostrils flies a noisome vapour, infecting the
ambient air: her hundred arms are interspersed with white, as in the garments
of the inquisition; and on her swollen trunk, are observed the speckles of a
mighty dragon … “.
The painting is quite
dramatic, “the clouds are disturbed” and in the distance a volcano erupts.
|
Dragon Arum or Dracunculus vulgaris |
The most famous of all the illustrations has to be
TheNight-blowing Cereus. It is, even after 200 years, quite stunning. Set against
a beautiful moonlit landscape, this gorgeous cactus flower glows with a
luminous beauty. The cactus was painted by Reinagle and the background was painted
by Pethers who was so well known for his nocturnal landscapes that he had the sobriquet
of ‘Moonlight Pethers’. I noticed that
there were two versions of this painting. In the first, the background is of an
English country churchyard, or as Thornton describes it
“ Each scenery is
appropriated to the subject. Thus in the night-blowing Cereus (Selenicereus grandiflorus) you have the moon playing on the dimpled water, and the
turret-clock points XII, the hour at which this flower is in it’s full expanse.”
However it was probably pointed out to Thornton that this cactus is highly
unlikely to bloom in the English countryside, and so a second painting, equally
beautiful but with a more appropriate background was commissioned. Compare the image below to the image at the top of this page.
|
Night-blowing Cereus, or Cactus grandiflorus (Reinagle) |
"The scientific name [for this flower] Selenicereus
literally means "lunar wax candle". It is likened to the moon because
it blossoms in the night and with candles because of its candle-like long
stem... This seems unnatural to us, as we are used to blossoms opening when
exposed to the sun. But because the queen of the night is pollinated by
nocturnal animals, in particular bats, it had to adapt its behaviour to the
circumstances, and offer the glory of its blossoms to the night."
Thornton’s passion for the whole project leaps out from
every page. Words pour out from him in a curious mix of botany, mythology,
history and poetry. He dedicates pages to detailed descriptions of battles and
to Persian, Greek, Hindu and Egyptian mythology. He discusses “
the needless and
atrocious murder of the Duke D’Enghien by torchlight”, which was obviously the
hot topic of the day, but perhaps not what you’d expect to find in a botanical
book!
|
Mimosa grandiflora or Large Flowering Sensitive Plant (Reinagle) I loved the little image of the Aboriginal man in the background looking in wonder at this tree. Thornton includes a little poem by Darwin, comparing the tree to the chaste Desdemona. "Fill'd with nice sense the chaste Mimosa stands, From each rude touch withdraws her timid hands: Oft, as light clouds o'erpass the summer's glade Alarm'd she trembles at the moving shade" |
Alas the whole project was doomed to failure.
Despite the
lavishness of the publication, it just didn’t sell, and Thornton soon found
himself in dire financial straits. Perhaps it was because of the Napoleonic wars,
which as Thornton laments “
The once moderately rich very justly now complain
that they are exhausted through taxes laid on them to pay armed men to diffuse
rapine, fire and murder, over civilised EUROPE”.
Perhaps the book was just too
expensive, too sumptuous and too indulgent. Desperate to continue with the
project (he originally wanted 70 colour plates), he set up a gallery in London
called "Dr. Thornton's Linnaean Gallery", but even that failed to recoup
his losses.
In 1812, faced with bankruptcy, Thornton had The Temple of
Flora set re-engraved on a small scale for a quarto edition, with some of the
compositions slightly altered. An act of parliament was passed allowing him to
set up a Royal Botanic Lottery with 20,000 tickets at two guineas each, using
the smaller formatted edition used as prizes, as well as the original paintings.
However the lottery failed to catch on and his debts grew.
Robert Thornton died in 1837, destitute and heartbroken,
despite having created one of the most beautiful and famous of all florilegia. You can see the whole book online
here.
|
The Nodding Renealmia (Henderson) |
I found the whole story deeply moving, particularly given
the outstanding quality of the artwork. The other botanical art books on display
were beautiful too, but really faded in comparison to this intriguing book. I
liked the concept of painting a landscape behind the plant too, one that
reflects the character of the plant. I felt that it had allowed the viewer to
relate to the plant in a completely different way, and helped the viewer to
engage with the subject. Sometimes I find botanical art a little too clinical
and remote, so Thornton’s approach is definitely something that I would like to
follow up with in my own art. I think I’ll skip the poetry though!
Who can paint like
Nature?
Amid his gay
creation, hues like these?
And can he mix them
with that matchless skill
And lay them on so
delicately fine
And make these
varied marks so just and true,
That each shall
tell the name denoting
It’s peculiar
birth?